2015/5/18 18:26:43    邮件 123474461  IP 我要留言  回复   This column is actually most unsatisfying. It seems to end up being political spin. Real journalism would be to further investigate the issues higher. For instance, who are the men you pictured from the article? What is their present status? Changing the photo caption from this late date is apparently inappropriate. This redaction of any historical and controversial information article smacks of Government and the Ministry with Truth. If the BBC ended up being mistaken, then the mistakes needs to be acknowledged and corrected from a less elliptical fashion. There must be answerability. On the other fretting hand, if the BBC article might be correct, to the points where this might contradict the official record in the us, the matter would next require further investigation and explication from the public interest. This does raise a good number of interesting questions about returning to college and editing stories after their publication not from a journalistic accuracy perspective but from a web publishing POV too. Personally I'm always detest to re write prior times. I'm not saying this can be something that's happened the following, but the more cynical out there could point to it as an example of precident setting.It's good that the amendment may be recorded publicly, and the reasons behind it. I do hope almost every other changes made are reflected clearly so no one can say the BBC is re writing stories. It is yet another in a very long line of misleading stories and features from well-known media that seek to dissuade attention from the cold, hard facts of your 9. 11 truth movement (and to be positive, it certainly is worth the "movement" moniker). First of all, the FBI has never formally charged some of these people the hijackers, bin Laden, and many others from the 9. 11 attacks. Furthermore, there is significant evidence to indicate that a few of the supposed hijackers have been alive and well in the middle East. Finally, and most importantly, this hijacker identity theory is a small and relatively unsubstantiatied claim manufactured by a few in your 9. 11 truth community, and is certainly regarding far less importance than the irrefutable and well documented evidence of a false flag functioning. http://www.bayviewkiosk.com http://www.ultrasonicsindia.com/p-73.html http://www.ymdod.com/p-28.html http://www.myhomeschooler.com/p-421.html http://www.myhomeschooler.com/p-452.html http://www.ymdod.com/p-94.html http://www.seamyhomerealty.com/p-169.html http://www.ultrasonicsindia.com/p-89.html http://www.myhomeschooler.com/p-430.html http://www.marcelocostas.com/c-4_7_8.html http://www.theromanbar.com/p-3.html http://www.marcelocostas.com/c-4_20_22.html http://www.marcelocostas.com/c-4_16_39.html http://www.ultrasonicsindia.com/p-71.html http://www.merrieacres.com/p-1081.html http://www.merrieacres.com/p-1063.html http://www.rookstobago.com/p-161.html http://www.matanzasbaydesign.com/p-98.html http://www.matanzasbaydesign.com/p-60.html http://www.spitalerifurniture.com/p-272.html http://www.marcelocostas.com/c-4_20_64.html http://www.rookstobago.com/p-163.html http://www.seamyhomerealty.com/p-173.html http://www.theromanbar.com/p-49.html http://www.myhomeschooler.com/p-7.html http://www.rookstobago.com/p-206.html http://www.rookstobago.com/p-214.html http://www.theromanbar.com/p-31.html http://www.merrieacres.com/p-1049.html http://www.matanzasbaydesign.com/p-99.html  回复：